Ripple Labs vs. SEC: A Positive Turn for Cryptocurrency Communities
Decentralization is upon us.
The recent court battle between Ripple Labs and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has brought significant implications for the cryptocurrency industry as a whole. In this article, we will explore how the court's decision regarding XRP and Ripple Labs distinguishes the implied sale contract from the underlying token, and why this outcome ultimately leads to a positive future for cryptocurrency communities. While Ripple may face challenges ahead, the implications of this ruling are likely to benefit other token issuers, exchanges, and retail investors.
1. A Clear Distinction: Tokens vs. Securities
The court's decision in the Ripple case recognizes a vital distinction between the tokens themselves and the implied securities contract. The theory put forth is that while the initial sales might be considered securities offerings, the tokens are not inherently securities. This distinction undermines the SEC's strategy of categorizing all tokens as securities, which has led to delistings and reduced exchange liquidity. This development is a significant win for the cryptocurrency industry.
2. Expanded Opportunities for Token Circulation
By acknowledging the separability of tokens from securities, the court ruling allows tokens to continue circulating within the existing onshore infrastructure. This decision is crucial as it safeguards the progress made in building crypto ecosystems, enabling tokens to thrive and fulfill their intended purposes.
3. Recognizing Different Distribution Methods
One notable aspect of the court's ruling is its recognition of a legal difference between large initial coin offerings (ICOs) or initial DEX offerings (IDOs) and more community-focused distribution methods like airdrops, mining, or yield farming. This distinction aligns with the moral difference at play, something I talk a lot about in this blog, and ensures that various distribution methods are treated differently under the law. It provides legal clarity for community-focused projects and highlights the significance of their contributions to the crypto landscape.
4. Implications for Programmatic Sales and Staking Rewards
The court's decision has far-reaching implications, particularly in relation to "programmatic sales" and staking rewards. The ruling suggests that occasional additional sales through exchanges do not qualify as securities offerings since buyers are not investing in the Ripple common enterprise. This perspective offers a strong argument against treating staking rewards as securities, further supporting the growth of token-based ecosystems.
5. Restricting Token-Flipping Funds
The court ruling inhibits the operation of token-focused crypto funds, like the ones seen with FTX and Alameda Research, by labeling primary purchases as securities transactions. This is a positive development, as it discourages the existence of token-flipping funds, which destabilized markets last year. By limiting their influence, the industry can focus on more sustainable and community-driven practices.
6. Better Congressional Intervention
This court ruling also highlights the need for good congressional intervention to clarify the classification of tokens as securities and to define the obligations of issuers and the rights of buyers. The ruling's counterintuitive outcome, where institutions that bought XRP in primary sales are left unprotected, creates a legal puzzle.
Congress has a role to play in providing regulatory clarity to ensure a fair and transparent environment for all participants in the crypto market. In my strong opinion congress should play an active role defining the legalities for primary sales of crypto (i.e. FTX) and a minimal role in defining legalities for community and retail use of crypto (i.e. staking rewards & airdrops).
Allin-all, it’s important to remember that congressional intervention is not a fundamental driver of crypto and that decentralized blockchains will keep producing new blocks regardless of government and regulatory intervention.
While Ripple Labs may face significant challenges in the aftermath of the court case, the implications of this ruling extend beyond their individual situation. The decision distinguishes between tokens and securities, promotes token circulation, supports community-focused distribution methods, and restricts the influence of token-flipping funds. Furthermore, it highlights the urgent need for congressional involvement in shaping the regulatory landscape. Ultimately, the biggest beneficiaries of this case will be other token issuers, exchanges, and retail investors, paving the way for a more vibrant and sustainable future for the cryptocurrency industry.
Last week I highlighted the moves in equities related to bitcoin and crypto.
These developments provide further reasons to feel bullish about the future of the crypto industry. Additionally, the comments made by Judge Failla overseeing the Coinbase lawsuit against the SEC indicate that things went worse for the SEC than initially reported.
In the Coinbase case, Judge Failla explicitly aligned herself with Coinbase on a crucial argument. She stated that it is not unreasonable for Coinbase to believe that their actions were acceptable because they were following the same practices that the SEC allowed when Coinbase issued their IPO registration (S-1). By making this point, the Judge not only supports Coinbase's perspective but also indicates that she sees merit in their argument.
Moreover, Judge Failla emphasized that the SEC might be underestimating the significance of Coinbase's S-1 issuance. This alignment with Coinbase is a significant indicator and raises concerns for the SEC. The fact that the Judge herself highlights this point is a clear sign that the SEC's position may not be as strong as they initially claimed.
These developments in the courtroom demonstrate a growing recognition of the complexities and nuances surrounding cryptocurrencies and the actions taken by crypto companies. The alignment of the Judge with Coinbase's argument suggests that the SEC's regulatory approach may be facing scrutiny and potential limitations. It also highlights the importance of considering the legal framework and precedents set by previous actions, such as the issuance of an IPO registration like Coinbase's S-1.
The tides are turning, and ultimately these decisions will come down to sovereign states and municipalities. Local jurisdictions should consider and decide how to run their economy. Now that we have blockchain this idea can work. I discussed the benefit of local currencies in this article (click button below).
The positive legal battles in support of bitcoin and crypto have been rolling in. The mainstream media doesn’t want you to focus on this but here are a few you can check out.
Montana has passed a bill that aims to establish the rights of cryptocurrency miners. The passing of the “Bitcoin Rights” bill marks a significant milestone for the crypto industry. Bill number 178 successfully passed the third reading in Montana’s House of Representatives in April 2023.
Texas has passed two bills aimed at furthering the adoption of cryptocurrency and blockchain. Texas House Bills 1576 and 4474, passed by both chambers in the state legislature in May and signed into law by Governor Greg Abbott.
The new Wyoming laws recognize legally protected property rights for owners of all types of digital assets, including cryptocurrency.
Governor Ron DeSantis of Florida has been a vocal supporter of cryptocurrency. In May 2021, he signed legislation defining virtual currency in state statute and clarifying that individuals can trade cryptocurrency without a license. He also signed legislation in May 2022 defining the term “virtual currency” to clarify state law on cryptocurrency and ease state financial regulations. He also proposed legislation that aims to protect residents of the state from the potential risks associated with a central bank digital currency (CBDC) and the increased government surveillance that may come with it.
Overall, these recent court rulings further support the notion that the crypto industry is gaining ground in its battle against regulatory challenges. It signifies a shift in the perception of cryptocurrencies and acknowledges the need for a more balanced and nuanced regulatory framework. As the industry continues to navigate legal hurdles and gain legal support, it strengthens the position of cryptocurrencies and instills confidence in the future of the crypto ecosystem.
If you liked this article, please subscribe to my Substack for free today!
Who is Tief
Jeffrey J. Tiefenthaler is the founder of Trading Tech and Consulting LLC. He is an experienced FinTech entrepreneur, accredited investor, and brand ambassador with two decades of experience trading in US stock and options markets, 15 years consulting for Microsoft brands such as Xbox, Windows and Bing. He’s been featured in CoinMarketCap and awarded number one for articles with the highest views, top 10 for projects by Engagement Growth, top 10 for projects by community followers gained.
